Update, January 2008: Most of you coming to this page are getting here from a post that explicitly says there are no nude pictures of the Olsen twins here. But you clicked anyway. You do realize, don’t you, that you’re the reason spammers are still in business?

blogoSFERICS is not in the Top Ten on Google for the search terms Mary Kate and Ashley nude.

There is a very good reason why this should be so: it’s because there are no pictures here of Mary Kate and Ashley nude. I’ve never seen pictures of Mary Kate and Ashley nude, so I wouldn’t know where to get pictures of Mary Kate and Ashley nude to post here. Besides, the girls being underage, pictures of Mary Kate and Ashley nude would be illegal to make, possess or distribute.

So if you came here searching ”Mary Kate and Ashley nude”, you’re out of luck. Go look for Mary Kate and Ashley nude nude somewhere else.

AND PLEASE PASS THE WORD!

Comments:

Link whore.

Ricky :: Jun 2, 2003 11:15 PM

Ricky, you say it as if that were a bad thing. Heheh.

zombyboy :: Jun 2, 2003 11:22 PM

You mean there aren’t any ILLEGAL NUDE PICTURES OF MARY KATE AND ASHLEY NUDE here!?

Jeez, what a rip…

photo hound :: Jun 3, 2003 2:59 AM

dang, that’s the only reason I was coming here ...

Tony :: Jun 3, 2003 11:41 AM

Well, I AM the #1 hit on google for “Alterman jackass” (and #3, go figure), so I have my link whoring moments.

Ricky :: Jun 3, 2003 1:17 PM

I’m getting what I can out of it before Google separates us bloggers into our own index so we can’t pollute the search results from the cyberporn sites, and the creepy middle-aged guys on Geocities with their Olsen Twins fan pages.

McGehee :: Jun 3, 2003 1:25 PM

Heck, an announcement THIS important should be in the Carnival of the Vanities!

nathan :: Jun 3, 2003 3:05 PM

Thanks, Dodd—good advice.

McGehee :: Jun 3, 2003 4:06 PM

Not everyone believes the google/blogger stuff.

Ricky :: Jun 3, 2003 5:02 PM

Thanks, Ricky—I’ve updated my post on the subject.

McGehee (IP: 24.216.252.130) Jun 3, 2003 7:03 PM

And there are no “Drew Barrymore nude pics” on my site, either. That reminds me ... it’t time for a Drew Darrymore update.

Bill Dennis :: Jun 3, 2003 8:05 PM

I’m still ticked because you never posted your photos of the “Night of Sin With Janet Reno” you attended at Hedonism a couple of years ago.

:: Jun 3, 2003 10:52 PM

Okay, I’m in.

You have to share the results of this googlebomb with us, to see how many people actually come to your site looking for the pics.

Timekeeper :: Jun 3, 2003 11:32 PM

As opposed to how many come to make sure I’m not lying about not having them?

Cam, those Hedonism pics didn’t come out, I’m afraid. Camera broke.

McGehee :: Jun 4, 2003 11:25 AM

any body now where you can find nude picures of the olsen twins

zach :: Jun 8, 2003 6:40 PM

If only I could believe zach’s post was a joke....

Dodd :: Jun 9, 2003 11:59 PM

Who ever wants pictures of the Olson twins nude is a fucking pervert

John Larson :: Jun 12, 2003 2:21 PM

For another year, at least.

McGehee :: Jun 14, 2003 8:17 PM

Just wanted to inform everyone that it is a FACT that there are no pictures of the Olsen twins nude. The ones you may find are hoaxes. If they ever would pose nude, you would have to wait 2 more years until they are 18.

Nico :: Jun 17, 2003 4:06 PM

According to Chaz, they turned 17 just last Friday.

Not that I’m counting…

McGehee :: Jun 17, 2003 5:37 PM