It would be impossible to refrain entirely from blogging through the month of October in a presidential election year, but the activity here is almost certainly going to be light between now and Halloween.
Besides, I have fiction to write. Y’all take up the slack for me on that blogging stuff, okay?
Even the big-government Democrats knew it was going to be an albatross.
“All we needed was enough to potentially get us over the finish line, but we wanted the Republicans to be the ones to do it. This was not going to be a Democrat-passed bill if the Speaker had anything to say about it.”
They could have passed it without a single Republican vote, but averting the end of the world as we knew it, took a back seat to the kind of bipartisanship these Democrats like to practice: that of shifting blame onto the other party.
Meanwhile, the sun still shines and the birds still sing. Is this crisis really as bad as the Mainstream Media have been telling us?
Even more to the point, be careful what you risk your entire institutional reserve of credibility—such as it is—for.
I probably should have been sending you this warning long ago—like, starting in 1992 maybe.
Oh wait, I was. Along with a whole lot of other people. Well, how many times do you think you’ll be able to pull your own self-pwn3d arses out of the fire after another one of your magical Democrats self-combusts all over you? (I know what Bill Clinton did all over you wasn’t literally combustion, but combustibilitywas involved...)
You have to know that once this election campaign is over, you’ll be back on the sidewalk again, trying to figure out how to withhold a little bit of money for yourself without your pimp finding out and beating you up.
Rude and distracted drivers in Coweta County—longtime readers of The McGehee Zone may already know about the tailgating and center-line crossing that goes on around here—have sent three rural mail carriers to the hospital this summer.
Betsy Tomlinson, a substitute carrier who’s driven all 15 of Sharpsburg’s routes, described the trend and the increasing “near misses” more bluntly.
“They’re rude. The drivers are just rude,” she said.
She described impatient drivers who follow too closely, and then slam on their brakes at the last minute or “sling out” into oncoming traffic to pass the carriers instead of waiting until there are safer sections to pass. While postal carriers pull off the road when they’re able, the problem with Hwys. 154 and 16 is that there aren’t a lot of places where the carriers can pull over.
“They’ll get right up on our rear end,” Tomlinson said. “I’ve had people behind me, follow me and watch me box the mail, stop after stop, and after they pass, they honk their horn at me. They get mad because I’m blocking their way, and I’m doing my job. Everybody out there is trying to do their job.”
A couple of weeks ago on our way home from dinner in my wife’s car, we were aggressively tailgated by a driver who didn’t like that Chris was obeying the speed limit. No matter what she did this lunatic didn’t back off for more than a couple of seconds—and then as we turned off the highway toward home, Rage Boy honked to make sure we knew his bad behavior was all our fault.
More recently, we were waiting to turn in at a local store, a left turn which mean we had to wait for oncoming traffic. When that traffic cleared, an idiot in a red pickup leaving the store honked at us for making our turn instead of letting him make his ahead of us.
Doesn’t it seem to you that acting rudely at a woman driver when her husband is in the car with her is kind of a dumb thing to do? That may be why none of these nutless wonders followed us to reiterate their displeasure face to face.
In my own truck, I was recently tailgated and nearly rear-ended by a woman in a pickup who was simply not paying attention to her driving. When I slowed to turn off, I watched in my rearview mirror and saw the precise moment when she realized she was about to plow into the rear end of my Bronco at 45 mph. And because my A/C is still out and I had my rear window partly rolled down for ventilation, I heard the screech of her tires as she locked up her brakes to avoid the collision.
What I don’t know is whether she was wishing, as she drove on after I made my turn, that she’d worn her brown pants. If I’d been in anything less massive myself, I probably would have been. At least she had the good grace not to honk at me for her mistake.
What will inevitably happen is that one of these rude yahoos will cross paths with another, and they’ll kill each other. Hopefully before they end up killing someone who’s merely stupid, or just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
As co-blogger Jonathan reports below, the Obama campaign has sicced its lawyers on t.v. stations that might air a well-sourced NRA advertisement that correctly points out Obama’s longstanding anti-gun record. The proper response to such attempts to infringe on the First Amendment is to make sure that the video in question receives the widest circulation possible, to deter the Obama campaign, and other campaigns for that matter, from engaging in such tactics in the future. So here it is. Share it with a friend, with a note that Obama is threatening legal action against stations that run it, in violation of the First Amendment.
Like the one below about the mortgage bank crisis, this one also needs to be put in front of as many eyes as possible—though in this case, people who don’t imagine that guns roam the streets at night like murderous zombies, would be the preferred target. Also, those who don’t think it’s kosher for a presidential candidate to try to bully media outlets into quashing opposing views.
Just watched another episode of “Sons of Anarchy,” the TV program I mentioned in this entry.
Another theme being prodded from time to time on the show is anarchism. Apparently Jax’s late father was drawn to the “outlaw” lifestyle of the motorcycle gang culture by the idea of being free of society’s stifling rules and institutions. In the series we’re actually seeing a late-stage development in that kind of society as it would play out in real life, with the ruthless alpha—Clay—ruling all but unchallenged over his riders, and ruling with little real opposition over the town of Charming. Presumably by reading his father’s idealistic writings about anarchism Jax will be drawn to try to get back to those ideals and re-establish an earlier stage of anarchic society.
I don’t expect to deal with anarchism in my stories because I’m not drawn to examine fatally flawed political ideas in stories that I’m trying to keep grounded in real life. However, real life is populated by people who are, like Jax’s father, drawn to political ideas that don’t hold up well against the realities of human nature.
So, I toyed idly with the thought of whether the wildest über alpha in my story so far—Seth Scruggins—would be drawn to anarchism.
Six weeks or so from today, we should know how the elections have turned out. If we don’t, it’ll be nobody’s fault but the Democrat election examiners in counties with Democrat majorities for expecting Democrats to know how to vote for the Democrat ticket. Just like eight years ago.
Anyway. I’ve had numerous queries about whom I’m supporting in the upcoming election (yes, zero is a number). So here goes:
President/Vice President:
I’m supporting, endorsing, and voting for the presidential ticket that includes Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska). Palin is the only conservative-like candidate on either of the major parties’ tickets. She is also the only one with executive experience in the public sector. She took on the corrupt GOP establishment in her home state and beat the snot out of it. She took on a complacent incumbent Republican governor in the August 2006 gubernatorial primary, and beat the snot out of him. Then she took on the man who was, at the time, Alaska’s most popular Democrat—and a man who had already served two terms as governor of Alaska—and beat the snot out of him.
She picked up an incomplete and poorly begun project for a pipeline to bring natural gas from the North Slope to market, and came up with a plan that would work—while depriving trough-feeding oil companies of billions in “incentive” subsidies they had claimed were necessary to build the pipeline (those companies then set about planning to build their own pipeline, without subsidies).
In contrast to the empty rhetoric emerging from both men on the Democrat ticket, Palin is a proven achiever and deserves to be brought into the major leagues.
U.S. Senate:
Incumbent Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss flirted with joining a compromise that would have enabled Democrats to keep a moratorium on oil production from the continental shelf, but due in part to overwhelming negative reaction that compromise failed. While troubled by the senator’s minoritarian thinking that led to his erstwhile position on this compromise, I cannot countenance electing Democrat Jim Martin, who would certainly support keeping Harry Reid as majority leader—and who slammed his primary rival for having supported (as a majority of Georgia’s elected Democrats did) George W. Bush’s re-election four years ago.
U.S. House of Representatives:
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland has taken flack over the course of his two terms in Congress for positions he’s taken—and for daring to use the word “uppity” in a public context—but all in all I’ve found that his controversial positions have been (as they were in Georgia’s legislature) in the interest of protecting taxpayers from impulsive spending actions by his fellow politicians. Even when those fellow politicians are Republicans. While everyone else is imagining a Palin-Jindal ticket in 2012, I’m envisioning a Palin-Westmoreland ticket; whereas Jindal appeals to an impulse to counter-program the Democrats’ identity politics, Westmoreland seems to share Palin’s tendency to buck the establishment for the people’s benefit. Substance over symbolism.
I won’t bore people with my arguments on state- or local-level races, since in many cases there aren’t even any Democrats on the ballot for these offices in November.
